<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John Schrom &#187; Intelligence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://john.mn/tag/intelligence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://john.mn</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:39:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Case for Monogamy?</title>
		<link>http://john.mn/2010/03/a-case-for-monogamy/</link>
		<comments>http://john.mn/2010/03/a-case-for-monogamy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnschrom.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study, set to be released in the March issue of Social Psychology Quarterly, suggests that people with higher IQs are more likely to favor atheism, liberalism, and monogamy (at least among males). &#8220;Smart&#8221; people are also more likely to align with unconventional philosophies, and demonstrate elitism. Go figure. These beliefs don&#8217;t have a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/26/liberals.atheists.sex.intelligence/index.html?hpt=Sbin">new study</a>, set to be released in the March issue of <a href="http://www.sagepub.com/journalsProdDesc.nav?prodId=Journal201972">Social Psychology Quarterly</a>, suggests that people with higher IQs are more likely to favor atheism, liberalism, and monogamy (at least among males).  &#8220;Smart&#8221; people are also more likely to align with unconventional philosophies, and demonstrate elitism.  Go figure.</p>
<p>These beliefs don&#8217;t have a traditional evolutionary advantage, but as we progress there&#8217;s less evolutionary pressure to support the status quo.  George Washington professor <a href="http://www.management.gwu.edu/facultypages/jbailey_bio.asp">James Bailey</a> says:<br />
<blockquote>&#8220;The adoption of some evolutionarily novel ideas makes some sense in terms of moving the species forward [...] It also makes perfect sense that more intelligent people &#8212; people with, sort of, more intellectual firepower &#8212; are likely to be the ones to do that.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The difference in IQs wasn&#8217;t great &#8212; ranging from 6 to 11 points (standard deviations is typically 15).  Participants who identified themselves as &#8220;very conservative&#8221; had an average IQ of 95, compared with 106 among the &#8220;very liberal.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m patiently awaiting the release of the full article, to gain a better grasp of their methods and results.  Until then, I can make myself seem smarter (and more elitist) by affirming my belief of liberalism and sexual exclusivity.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohn.mn%2F2010%2F03%2Fa-case-for-monogamy%2F&amp;title=A%20Case%20for%20Monogamy%3F" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://john.mn/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://john.mn/2010/03/a-case-for-monogamy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

